The Research Rotation Program
The Research Rotation Program is an integral component of the first year in our Program. Each first year student in the Program is required to undertake and pass three quarter-long (ten week) Research Rotations, one in the Fall, Winter and Spring quarters. For Fall, Winter, and Spring rotations (but not summer rotations), students should register for BNFO 298.
The aims of the Research Rotation Program are:
- Provide opportunities for students and faculty to determine whether there is a mutual rapport (“chemistry”) that may form the basis for a successful advisor-student relationship.
- Provide students with training opportunities to learn hands-on research skills in the host laboratory.
- Provide students opportunities to develop personal and scientific connections that may result in collaborative research (many students have catalyzed collaborations between laboratories) and/or appointments as co-advisor/dissertation committee members.
Guidelines and Rules of the Research Rotation Program
Students are responsible for identifying laboratories/faculty they are interested in joining for a Research Rotation. Students may only rotate with faculty who could also function as their Disseration Advisors. All rotations must be with different faculty.
Faculty are encouraged to develop short projects for rotation students so that students can get a sense of the lab and learn research skills. Rotation projects may or may not be related to possible Ph.D. dissertation projects. Students should check the Rotation Projects Descriptions website (BISB projects site; BMI projects site) to identify projects of interest. Please refer to our Faculty Directory for a full list of Program Faculty contact information and research interests. If faculty do not have a rotation project listed online please contact them directly to discuss available projects.
- The One-Page Rotation Project Proposal. For each rotation project, the Student is required to submit a one-page proposal, signed by the Rotation Mentor, to the Program Coordinator by the first day of instruction of the quarter. Thus it is expected that Faculty interested in hosting students for a rotation work with the student prior to the first day of instruction of the quarter to outline the project. The document represents a commitment by the Faculty to provide the student with Research Rotation Project and training/supervision during the quarter.
- The Five-Page Rotation Project Report. To complete the ten-week rotation, the Student is required to submit a five-page report, signed by the Rotation Mentor, to the Program Coordinator by the last day of instruction of the quarter. It should summarize the work, results and conclusions. The document becomes part of the student's academic record and provides the advisor with a record of the student's accomplishments. Failure to complete a rotation within a quarter will result in an “incomplete” on the student's transcript.
- The Oral Rotation Project Presentation. At Research Rotation meeting(s) during the subsequent quarter, the Student is required to present their Research Rotation work. The purpose of these meetings is to provide an opportunity to fine-tune presentation skills, and to encourage scientific exchange between students to develop community and inform each other of research opportunities among diverse Program Faculty. Currently, these presentations occur in the Student Research Talks (BNFO 283) in Fall, Winter, and Spring quarters; for Spring and Summer rotations, the presentations are in the following Fall quarter.
- Student Evaluation. The student's Research Rotation work is evaluated by the Rotation Mentor using a confidential evaluation sheet, and by the Program's Research Rotation Program Coordinators who review the Five-Page Rotation Project Report and the Oral Presentation. The Rotation Mentor is required to submit the evaluation sheet by one week after the last day of instruction of the quarter to the Program Coordinator.
Guidelines for Matching Students and Ph.D. Advisors
The match-making process is guided by the principle that allowing students (and faculty) to make decisions free of pressures leads to be best match and most productive student-advisor relationship and Ph.D. dissertation work.
At the conclusion of the 3rd rotation, students and faculty can begin discussions about students joining labs, and about possible dissertation projects. However, prior to Spring quarter Finals week, while the Rotation Program is in process, such discussions are inappropriate, as they prejudice students as well as faculty in subsequent rotations, thereby disadvantaging other students and faculty in the Rotation Program. As such, overt recruiting prior to Spring quarter Finals week is not permitted under the Rotation Programs guidelines.
When a student and faculty agree to form a Ph.D. partnership, they inform the Program Coordinator, and the prospective advisor provides information about relevant funding sources. The steering committee formally approves the match.
All students, regardless of their background and elective track, are expected to identify a dissertation research laboratory at the end of the Spring quarter, such that they may begin their doctoral research in the summer. However, any student may petition the Curriculum Committee to undertake additional rotations.
In the event that a student needs to do summer rotations, summer is split into two 6-week rotation periods, which do not align with UCSD summer session's 5-week quarters. The first one starts the week after Spring Quarter finals week. Since graduate students do not normally take classes during the summer, it is expected that a 6-week summer rotation will have similar scope to a normal 10-week rotation during the school year. For summer rotations, the one-page proposal is due by the first day of the rotation period; the five-page project report is due by the last day; the student evaluation is due one week after the last day; and the oral report will be done in the fall quarter.
|Academic year 2013-14||Proposal||5 page report||Student evaluation||Oral report|
|Fall||Thu Sep 26, 2013||Fri Dec 6, 2013||Fri Dec 13, 2013||Winter 2014|
|Winter||Mon Jan 6, 2014||Fri Mar 14, 2014||Fri Mar 21, 2014||Spring 2014|
|Spring||Mon Mar 31, 2014||Fri Jun 6, 2014||Fri Jun 13, 2014||Fall 2014|
|Advisor-Student Match Up||June 9-13, 2014|
|1st Summer||Mon Jun 16, 2014||Fri Jul 25, 2014||Fri Aug 1, 2014||Fall 2014|
|2nd Summer||Mon Jul 28, 2014||Fri Sep 5, 2014||Fri Sep 12, 2014||Fall 2014|
|Academic year 2014-15||Proposal||5 page report||Student evaluation||Oral report|
|Fall||Thu Oct 2, 2014||Fri Dec 12, 2014||Fri Dec 19, 2014||Winter 2015|
|Winter||Mon Jan 5, 2015||Fri Mar 13, 2015||Fri Mar 20, 2015||Spring 2015|
|Spring||Mon Mar 30, 2015||Fri Jun 5, 2015||Fri Jun 12, 2015||Fall 2015|
|Advisor-Student Match Up||June 8-12, 2015|
|1st Summer||Mon Jun 15, 2015||Fri Jul 24, 2015||Fri Jul 31, 2015||Fall 2015|
|2nd Summer||Mon Jul 27, 2015||Fri Sep 4, 2015||Fri Sep 11, 2015||Fall 2015|
|Academic year 2015-16||Proposal||5 page report||Student evaluation||Oral report|
|Fall||Thu Sep 24, 2015||Fri Dec 4, 2015||Fri Dec 11, 2015||Winter 2016|
|Winter||Mon Jan 4, 2016||Fri Mar 11, 2016||Fri Mar 18, 2016||Spring 2016|
|Spring||Mon Mar 28, 2016||Fri Jun 3, 2016||Fri Jun 10, 2016||Fall 2016|
|Advisor-Student Match Up||June 6-10, 2016|
|1st Summer||Mon Jun 13, 2016||Fri Jul 22, 2016||Fri Jul 29, 2016||Fall 2016|
|2nd Summer||Mon Jul 25, 2016||Fri Sep 2, 2016||Fri Sep 9, 2016||Fall 2016|
|Academic year 2016-17||Proposal||5 page report||Student evaluation||Oral report|
|Fall||Thu Sep 22, 2016||Fri Dec 2, 2016||Fri Dec 9, 2016||Winter 2017|
|Winter||Mon Jan 9, 2017||Fri Mar 17, 2017||Fri Mar 24, 2017||Spring 2017|
|Spring||Mon Apr 3, 2017||Fri Jun 9, 2017||Fri Jun 16, 2017||Fall 2017|
|Advisor-Student Match Up||June 12-16, 2017|
|1st Summer||Mon Jun 19, 2017||Fri Jul 28, 2017||Fri Aug 4, 2017||Fall 2017|
|2nd Summer||Mon Jul 31, 2017||Fri Sep 8, 2017||Fri Sep 15, 2017||Fall 2017|